Engagement and Active Learning
It is said that teaching and learning usually
go together. It is also widely known by all of us who teach, that student's do
not always learn. As I read the chapters of Student Engagement Techniques by Elizabeth Barkley,
I find myself thinking about the relationship between these two words.
In my first class in
this program, my instructor Karen Brooke asked me this exact question in my
exit interview. I fumbled my answer. What is the relationship between
teaching and learning? It was not until now that I have gained a bit
of clarity.
Teachers tend to
bank on the notion that because they are teaching, learning is taking
place. We use words like engagement and active learning to define our roles in
the classroom. I ask though, are our students engaged? Are they
learning actively?
Active learning, as
defined in chapter 3, is an umbrella term that includes:
- Cooperation
- Collaboration
- Discovery
- Experience
- Problem-solving
- Inquiry
It is also thought
that because we get students up, moving around, and chatting, that they
learning. We believe that because they are in groups talking to each other they
are learning. This is simply not the case. I have observed many lessons taught
by others where I leave the room asking myself what did they just learn
in that 90 minute class?
A better definition
for teachers to work with is active learning takes place when the mind is
engaged. To do so, conditions need to be created in lessons where students can
self-question, analyze, and reflect on their past experience and incorporate
new information.
So, to return to my
initial question, what is the relationship between teaching and
learning? I think of it like a house. Students have spent years building
their houses. These houses can renovated, upgraded, and repaired, if given the
right tools.
Comments
Post a Comment